Course outline

Long-Term Holdouts and Effect Decay

By the end of this lesson, you should be able to: tell decay from a permanent gain, say when a holdout can first rule out pure novelty, size a holdout against what it costs, and name the reason a long-running holdout stops being valid.

The same experiment, read at different times

Meridian launches a loyalty programme to 80% of riders and holds 20% back. Trips per user, treated against holdout:

Read atMeasured liftVersus the 26-week answer
Week 1+10.2%4.2x
Weeks 1-2+9.1%3.8x
Weeks 1-4+7.5%3.1x
Weeks 5-8+4.3%1.8x
Weeks 13-16+2.8%1.2x
Weeks 23-26+2.5%1.0x

Every one of those numbers is a correct measurement of a real randomised comparison. They differ because the effect itself changed, not because any of them was computed wrongly.

A team that ran two weeks, saw +9.1%, and put that in the annual plan has booked roughly four times the value the feature delivers. The two-week readout contains no signal that this will happen.

Two panels. Left, measured lift by week falling from about 10% in week 1 toward a teal dotted floor at 2.4%, with an amber shaded band over the first two weeks labelled as a two-week readout, and a dashed rose curve showing what pure novelty decaying to zero would have looked like. Right, five error bars for the trailing four-week lift read at weeks 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26, narrowing and settling onto the 2.4% floor.
Left: two curves that are nearly identical for the first month and mean opposite things. Right: what waiting buys.

Decay or dilution

Here's the distinction that decides what you do, and the reason a holdout has to keep running.

A novelty effect decays to nothing. Users tried the loyalty programme because it was new, the interest wore off, and the long-run value is zero. Ship it and you've added maintenance for nothing.

A real effect that settles decays to a smaller, permanent level. The initial spike was novelty on top of a genuine gain. Ship it and you get 2.4% forever.

Those two stories look nearly identical early:

WeekMeasuredIf it decays to zeroIf it settles at 2.4%
1+10.2%+9.0%+9.0%
2+8.1%+7.2%+7.7%
3+6.8%+5.8%+6.6%
6+4.7%+3.0%+4.6%
10+2.9%+1.2%+3.3%
18+3.2%+0.2%+2.6%
26+2.7%+0.0%+2.4%

At week 3 the two stories differ by 0.8 points and no measurement can separate them. By week 18 they differ by the entire remaining effect.

That gap is what the extra fifteen weeks of holdout bought. It is not precision on a number you already had; it is the difference between "ship it" and "delete it".